Monday, June 30, 2003

The Middle East should follow South Africa's example by: Mohamed S. Kamel


Letter to the editor, followed by the original article

The Middle East should follow South Africa's example

Jun 30, 2003

In response to Ms. Herzog article in the Globe and Mail, Tuesday June 24th, 2003, paste bellow, I would like to point out to a confusion between the real experience of South Africa example and the proposed peace plans in the middle east.

The South Africa example is an example of serving justice never been an example of compromise, this example is the best example in the history, whish explain that the only steps toward standing peace through a real rational negotiations. This negotiations led to a real peace, because it started with the only logical step Justice whish is the foundation of the building, that led to Reconciliation and Normalization and established real Peace which is the only road to Security for everyone. That is how the apartheid regime came to end and people was able to leave together when they abolish the white superiority.

While the “Road map” and all other so called proposed peace plans are not real because they try to build the building from the roof by seeking security for the occupation while criminate the legitimate resistance, those plans will never see the end of the tunnel because they only take into consideration the present supper power and maintaining the upper hand for Israel and its control over the all area.

Justice not been served since 1947, apartheid and inhuman is going on for more than 55 years. Are we looking for real lasting peace or we are buying time to be sure of the success of the Zionist plan.


Mohamed S. Kamel; ing.
sherif@unforgettable.com
www.apm-ram.com
  


The Mideast roadmap should follow South Africa's lead
By SHIRA HERZOG
Globe and Mail, Canada, Tuesday  June 24th, 2003


Israelis often react dismissively when their conflict with Palestinians is compared with the South African story. On the face of it, they're right. Israel isn't governing the West Bank and Gaza through an apartheid system, and its negotiations with the Palestinians are aimed at separating into two states rather than sharing power in one. The real differences between the two situations, however, lie in several key ingredients that facilitated success in South Africa and are missing in the Israeli-Palestinian relationship. This week, former South African prime minister F..W. de Klerk is in Israel to address a conference on conflict resolution. As painstaking efforts to achieve an initial Israeli-Palestinian ceasefire are underway, it's worth considering what the relevant lessons of South Africa might be.
The first lesson is openness. A critical element in South Africa's transition process was the transparency of negotiations between the governing National Party and the African National Congress. White and black leaders realized that involving their own people was essential for negotiations to succeed. Even before the formal negotiating process, an extensive bottom-up process engaged broad sectors of the population and complemented the talks at the top-down leadership level.
Ultimately, the combination of determined leaders and informed constituencies made it possible to overcome the inevitable setbacks, and the result was impressive. Although 10,000 South Africans were killed between 1991-94, the negotiating process continued.
The critical role of public engagement has been overlooked all along in the Israeli-Palestinian equation. As early as the 1993 Oslo Accord, negotiators on both sides failed to appreciate the importance of legitimizing a deal within their own constituencies and didn't believe in transparency or inclusiveness. The Israeli government and the Palestinian Authority paid lip service at best to their commitment in the accord to encourage civil-society peace building. While formal peace talks continued, Palestinian media preached violence, and Israel restricted Palestinians' movements and expanded settlements. Israeli and Palestinian non-governmental organizations that were committed to dialogue achieved some success in spite of the indifference or hostility of their respective governments.
South Africa offers a more pointed lesson for Israelis and Palestinians. Roelf Meyer, chief National Party negotiator, has written eloquently of the "personal paradigm shift" that paved the way for his successful negotiations with the ANC.
Mr. de Klerk's original goal was to make sufficient adjustments to the country's apartheid system to stabilize the country but without sacrificing continued special status for the white minority. According to Mr. Meyer, the real breakthrough in negotiations occurred only in 1992, when the South African leader understood that this old paradigm had to go. Once Mr. de Klerk realized that the Afrikaner minority's rights could best be protected in a democracy, even with majority black rule, his interests and those of the ANC converged in a new, common vision. (Both Mr. de Klerk and then ANC leader Nelson Mandela received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1993 for their roles in ending apartheid and introducing representative democracy.)
Israelis and Palestinians still cling to an old, win-lose paradigm, in which one side's gains are seen as the other's losses. As long as Israelis don't accept Palestinians as equal partners in a new, win-win paradigm based on a viable Palestinian state alongside Israel, negotiations will be undermined by suspicion and manipulation. Like Mr. de Klerk in 1990, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon knows that in the face of new international realities and demographic pressures, the greater risk is to take no risk.
Therefore, he acknowledges the need to change an intolerable status quo. But a negotiating strategy that discounts Palestinian needs and interests is likely to yield only limited success.
Palestinians have an additional challenge. In South Africa, the ANC's leadership recognized early on how essential it was to reassure white South Africans of their future position in a democratic South Africa. The ANC built legitimacy for the deal within its own ranks while actively calming the fears of Afrikaners about the workability and fairness of the new system. Most importantly, the ANC dealt decisively with violence and incitement, and assumed responsibility for its community's statements and actions.
The Palestinian Authority hasn't measured up to the ANC's test of leadership.
Under the leadership of Yasser Arafat, it failed to legitimize the two-state approach among Palestinians. Mr. Arafat never told his people what they would have to give up for the sake of a deal, nor did he relinquish the option of violence. His equivocating rhetoric and tolerance for the terrorism of extremist factions convinced Israelis that he was unreliable and dishonest. Now, although Palestinian Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas appears to have a clear vision for the future, he can no longer guarantee his community's co-operation. Because Mr. Abbas lacks legitimacy in the Palestinian street, he is unable to reassure Israelis that he can be a credible, committed partner.
While the conditions that helped South Africans in their transition are clearly missing in the Middle East, Mr. de Klerk can give Israelis and Palestinians one clear message: The two people are inextricably intertwined in this deep-rooted conflict. They can either continue to exacerbate their mutually destructive tendencies or identify a common vision and set out to surmount fear and mistrust.
Please read and feel free to forward, print, and publish.
We would like to apologize fro any repeated messages, and any typing or grammatical errors.
We act because we believe in this quote: ” You can fool some people some time, but you cannot fool all people all time”


Mohamed S. Kamel
internationalnews-owner@yahoogroups.com
www.apm-ram.com


Disclaimer
We are committed to free knowledge, unless otherwise indicated, the opinions, personal articles or news analysis expressed on this e-mails are not necessarily those of the sender. This e-mail has been compiled in good faith. It is our condition that, in exchange for this free information, you the receiver accept that we will not be liable for any action you, the user take based on the information in this e-mail. It is essential that you, the user verify any and/or all information contained herein before making your final decision. This e-mail does not necessarily endorse the ideas or presentation of ideas of the sites it links to and with. We make no representations about any linked web site's accuracy, completeness, and authenticity. We firmly believe in the Freedom of Speech. We believe in civilized exchange of ideas and thoughts. We will hold any one trying to damage our image legally responsible before the courts and will keep ourselves the right to pursue the perpetrators to the maximum law limit. If you do not agree with this disclaimer or would like to stop receiving our e-mails, please unsubscribe, if you find that this e-mail is a good source of knowledge and would like to invite any others, please feel free.




Sunday, June 15, 2003

This is why you have to get involved, Coverage of a security certificate case by: Mohamed S. Kamel


This is why you have to get involved
Coverage of a security certificate case by: Mohamed S. Kamel

Jun 15, 2003


[Those new laws and unjust treatment we are speaking about are in Canada, and not in a third world country, this shameful laws coming into effect thanks the Canadian’s solicitor general, minister of immigration, the Canadian Intelligence Services CSIS, and the Media]


Do you know that under the security certificate, secret evidence could be used against you, which neither you nor your lawyer is allowed to know, and condemn you with no right to appeal?

CSIS seems to believe every Muslim or Arab is a sleeper and you just have to push a button and they become a terrorist, that is the same what is the Zionist movement are spreading as part of the Islamophobia and Anti-Arab propaganda, and that is what the main mission of people like Daniel Pipe, one of the main players of Bush administration and the God father of many of the right wing politician in Canada.

Some people did understand that from the experience of Adil Charkaoui and his family and started to work in a group to defend Adil rights for justice. As stated by “La Press” a French Newspaper from Montreal under the banner read “Justice for Adil Charkaoui” people met to hear the story of the Moroccan 30 years old Adil Charkaoui and his family who moved to Canada in 1995 dreaming of a good life in a nice country governed by justice and law.

Adil is married has an 18 month old daughter and his wife is 6 month pregnant. Educated in a variety of schools including a Jewish school, he is a French teacher doing his masters in University of Montreal. He was arrested in 21 May 2003 by the RCMP (Canadian Police) for no crime, but a Security Certificate issued in 16 May 2003 by the Solicitor General and the Minster of Immigration upon recommendation by the CSIS branded him a threat to national security. Notice this is the same CSIS who’s credibly has been questioned by allegations in the Air India Affair and others.

In an Information session hold May 31st 2003 names of the people detained under this security certificate have been reminded by: Mohamed Mahgoub since 2000, Mohamed Harakat since Dec. 2002, Mahmoud Gab Allah since 1999 and now Adil Charkoui that was not the only threat to the Arab and Muslim, this came in addition to the daily discrimination, the daily media propaganda and the campaign of deportation of the Algerian and Palestinian refugees.

In this event that has been organized by the Justice Coalition For Adil Charkaoui, a coalition of many organizations and individuals, among them the Muslim Council of Montreal (MCM), Voice of Conscience, Home not Bomb from Toronto.

Abdel-Salam Elminyawy the president of the MCM said that how we can trust CSIS while one of their agents identified as David: dose not know the population of Egypt, dose not know what countries are located in North Africa and thinks that Iran is an Arabic Country, Mr. Elminyawi explained that his law is a real threat to Canadian Security because with injustice people will not help the security agents. He called upon the Media to be honest and not to expose the people personal life and their families. To stop the propaganda by accusing him of being an Al-Qaieda member because he is Muslim, visited Pakistan and he teaches self-defense to Muslims.

And from No one Illegal, Mr. Emanuel said that they are in solidarity with every Canadian facing discrimination, and he denounce the unjust arrest and the unfair trial, explaining how the USA and Canada stand by considering the Palestinian resistance terrorism while it is against the occupation and the state terrorism, this stand is ill moral and that the discrimination against Muslim and Arab mad theme a escape goat to keep the all the society afraid so that the security agents can increase their budget.

Mohamed Shaleby from Non Status Algerian explain how the Algerian case been partially solved for 80% if them by believe and hard work, and who Canada became a country that dose not support human rights it is only looking for business.

On CSIS’ way of handling security issue, Mr. RIAD SALOOJEE the executive director of the CAIR-CAN Council on American-Islamic Relations said in the Globe and Mail on his article “CSIS warrants contravene rule of law”:
“….it will be impossible to know whether Montreal resident Adil Charkaoui, who has been recently accused of being a member of an Al-Qa'ida sleeper cell, is innocent or guilty…”
“…All Canadians should be concerned about terrorists in our midst. There is, as well, another reason why Canadians ought to be concerned with the Charkaoui case and with many other similar cases before the courts: the rule of law.
Security-certificate cases are anything but transparent. Certificates are frequently issued by the immigration minister or the solicitor-general through a murky process with no parliamentary oversight. Individuals are sometimes branded as terrorists on the basis of dubious evidence obtained from sources - a litany of non-democratic countries, for example - that are, at best, problematic.
The politicized nature of these certificates is frankly acknowledged by former CSIS agent Michel Juneau-Katsuya who noted that the Charkaoui's arrest "may have been done as a pre-emptive strike or to destabilize a network, or it may have been done under pressure to please the Americans.
Assuming that there is some evidence, however, Charkaoui will be still be batting blind because he and his lawyer will not be shown the heart of the evidence against him. On this lack of transparency, Juneau-Katsuya is equally candid: Because the majority of evidence is never disclosed, Charkaoui will be left to defend himself in the dark…”
“…Charkuoui's assertion, that he has been pinpointed because he rejected the overtures from CSIS to spy on the community, is also worthy of scrutiny. There have been numerous complaints against CSIS of late, all reported in the media. For example, CSIS requesting that Egyptian intelligence detain a Toronto imam who was en route to Canada; recent stories about CSIS's rather active and aggressive recruitment drive in the Algerian community; and CSIS involvement in the deportation of Canadian Maher Arar to Syria.
Toronto lawyer Clayton Ruby argues that, "Crimes are committed in a casual and routine way by CSIS." In fact, for a long list of CSIS's rather shadowy workings, see the book Covert Entry by investigative reporter Andrew Mitrovica. It's an eye-opening plot of illegal entry, tax evasion, destruction of evidence, illegal eavesdropping, theft and fraud. For starters…”
On Globe and Mail and under the title “When liberties fall in security's name” the point concerning the counter terrorism practices

“…Little of this reassures those concerned about civil liberties. While we want to presume the good faith of the authorities, they are not immune to overzealous, misguided actions. The minor cases that have trickled into the criminal, and thus public, courts are instructive.

Consider Tarek Adealy Khafagy, a hapless Montreal baker of Egyptian origin arrested in 2000 by RCMP agents acting on a tip. He was accused of plotting to blow up the Israeli consulate. Mr. Khafagy spent five months behind bars until he was acquitted. It turned out that the Mounties' informant owed $6,000 (U.S.) to Mr. Khafagy and thought framing him would be a way to get rid of a creditor.

In Mr. Jaballah's case, Justice Mac- Kay's ruling repeatedly spoke of an abuse of process because of the way the Immigration Department didn't respond promptly to his application for protection from possible torture or death if he were deported to Egypt.

The lack of safeguards when secret evidence is heard is troubling enough that Mr. Justice James Hugessen last year went public about the way he and others on the Federal Court feel. "We hate it," he said. "We do not like this process of having to sit alone, hearing only one party and looking at the materials produced by only one party."

On Globe and Mail and under the title “Immigrant is al-Qaeda agent, CSIS says”  TU THANH HA wrote:

"…The service is of the opinion that Charkaoui fits the profile of a
sleeper agent who could be activated at any time," one CSIS filing said.

The documents say that CSIS agents have been monitoring Mr. Charkaoui for a while but moved to detain him now because of this spring's war in Iraq, during which Iraqi Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf called on Muslims everywhere to wage holy war against the U.S.-British coalition…”

“…The synopsis that was made public yesterday omits key information, leaving the impression that Mr. Charkaoui's main sin is that he taught karate and that he knew Muslim people who subsequently turned out to be terror suspects...”

On a press release The Canadian Arab Federation (CAF) called the ‘Security Certificates’ an insult to Canadians and called for a major overhaul of the current practice that allows, under the Immigration and Refugee protection act, for the detention and eventual expulsion of certain individuals based on a ministerial certificate.  

“…A ‘Security Certificate’ was used in Montreal last week to detain a 30-year-old Moroccan-born man, Adil Charkaoui, on suspicion he is connected to terrorists.  Another man, Mahmoud Jaballah, an Egyptian-born with 4 children, has spent 22 months in solitary confinement in a Toronto cell on similar suspicions.  “It is un-Canadian to hold someone without charges or proof of guilt. This flies against the basic rules of justice…”

CAF calls for a new process that allows for evidence to be challenged while allaying fears over national security.  “Judges need to hear both sides of the story and have the benefit from cross-examination of the evidence. This is how justice in a civilized society is served…”

The Canadian Muslim Forum (CMF) in its press release called Mr. Charkaoui’s unjust treatment is an insult to Canadian values and that the arrest by a “secret certificate” a fall out of the Islamophobia and anti-Arab propaganda, therefore the CMF invokes the “charter of rights and freedom”; henceforth the right of the accused for a due process.


Canada's national security has always been and continues to be ensured by Canada's systems of Law and Order, therefore all Canadians, regardless of ethnicity and religion, are equally protected under the Canadian law.

Canada's charter “of rights and freedom” guarantees the civil rights of all Canadians under the law of the land, therefore every Canadian citizen or permanent resident is entitled to a protection against self-incrimination, secret evidence, and racial profiling and have the right for a due process.

Mr. Charkaoui's case was handled, by certain media, with racism linking him to its Arab origin and to Al- Qaida, and he was unjustly served a “security certificate” denying him access to a due processes every other Canadian or permanent resident.

The CMF considers the unjust treatment of Mr. Charkaoui insulting to the Canadian socio-democratic values; equality and justice.

The CMF condemns the media discrimination and the security mistreatment of any Canadian, regardless of race, ethnicity or religion, and invokes the “charter of rights and freedom” and calls for the abolition of all non-regular laws and procedures.

In a joined press release the  “La Ligue des droits et libertés”, Amnesty International – Canada, the American Association for Justice and the Coalition for the international monitoring of the civil liberty denounce the Canadian Government using of the “Security Certificate” to arrest and detain Adil Charkaoui…” “…this certificate that designed to protect the national security became a threat to the rights and the freedom..”

“… The procedure under this Security Certificate is in contrary to the rule of fundamental justice…”
“…The application of this certificate would result of a deportation of a refuge or an immigrant to his native country where he could be terture or even killed...”

Adil Charkoui's defense lawyer Rocco Galati said it's unacceptable that his client is in jail without knowing details of the case against him. "If they have the evidence, why don't they charge him under the Criminal Code?" "This is the same process we saw in France before the revolution with “lettres de cachet”, and it's the same process we used during the Second World War against Japanese and Italian Canadians who were interned." "It is medieval" "We've reverted to a pre-English Bill of Rights, a pre-French Revolution system of royal rule and no constitutional rights whatsoever where we can decide these things in secret," he stated.


Generally the fear became part of the Muslim and Arab lifes, and Canadian
generally are feeling less secure, as stated by Mr. Yahya Abdul Rahman, the editor of the online Montreal Muslim News Network in his article “As a Canadian CSIS makes me feel less secure and its' pontification about "national security" is disingenuous”

“…We are asked to trust them because if they publicly reveal what evidence they have against Mr. Charkaoui, the security of Canadians would be compromised…”

 “…The problem is that this method does not provide for the proper checks and balances embedded in usual criminal proceedings here in Canada.  How do we know the authorities are not acting on prejudice or making many mistakes? …”

“…The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that " Everyone has the right on arrest or detention to be informed promptly of the reasons therefore" and also in section 11 everyone has the right " to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal."

These principals are not being respected in the case of Mr. Charkaoui, and several others who find themselves under similar circumstances who are charged with "secret evidence."

If CSIS can knock on my door in the dead of night, haul me away and say they have secret evidence against me which I or my lawyer are not allowed to see, then as far as I am concerned allowing this to happen is a threat to Canada's national security. No one will be safe in this country as we make this slippery descent into barbarism…”

“…all those living in Canada are under attack, and that should be a cause of concern for all Canadians.

It is Charkaoui today, but who knows, maybe it will be you tomorrow…”

In the Montreal Gazette under Security handcuffs defence JAMES MENNIE wrote

“…They had Adil Charkaoui in handcuffs when they brought him into Room 3.06, but after a few minutes you got the impression it was the court whose hands were tied…”

“…Federal Court Justice Simon Noël looked out at the courtroom and brought everyone up to speed. Noël explained how "the legislators" obliged him to review the federal government's case against Charkaoui within 48 hours of the latter's arrest. He explained he had seven days to review whatever information the government could provide to back up its claim that the quiet-looking…” “…Noël explained to the McGill St. courtroom it was his duty to make sure the process of addressing the government's case against Charkaoui be conducted in an expedient manner. He also said how important it was that Charkaoui be made aware of the allegations against him.

But as he approached the part about just what exactly Charkaoui is legally entitled to know, about just how much of the government case could be made public without compromising what that same government contends are the interests of national security, the tempo of Noël's résumé began to slow.

And it was then that the judge asked himself out loud whether the information he did finally share with Charkaoui's lawyers was sufficient to their case without compromising Canada's security.

"And after some deep reflection and a few sleepless nights, I found the answer was yes."

“…In a typical criminal proceeding, the accused is charged by the Crown and it falls to the Crown to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt to a judge or a jury. The Crown's case must be fully disclosed to the defence so the latter can poke and prod and examine it, because in this country, the rights of the accused are, however frustratingly on occasion, paramount.

But in Charkaoui's case, things are different. He has been charged with no crime….” “…a case that can be summed up by the presiding judge as follows: "The government says you're a threat to national security and you should be kicked out of the country. Here's most of their case against you. I can't tell you the rest because of national security. "So, now, convince me why I shouldn't believe them."


Justice for Adil Charkoui is justice for all Canada let us fight to abolish is law and to be all equal in front of normal law of land and not in the hand of spy agent.
Justice Coalition For Adil Charkoui is calling for all people to show up on support for a due process on his bail hearing that set for July 2nd at he Montreal court 80 McGill street at 9:00 AM
Justice Coalition For Adil Charkaoui could be reach in Toronto the Campaign to Stop Secret Trials in Canada at (416) 651-5800, and by e-mail at: justiceforadil@riseup.net And all information are available at Montreal Muslim News www.adilinfo.org

Now we all know that under the security certificate, secret evidence could be used against any of us, which neither you nor your lawyer is allowed to see? And they could condemn you with no right to appeal!

So I think this is the time to move, to resist this injustice and to move all of us to support this coalition and to call for abolishing this law, this needs effort and money; time has come that all civil social organization set a side a small percentage of their budget and activities for the well being of all population politically.


Please read and feel free to forward, print, and publish.
We would like to apologize fro any repeated messages, and any typing or grammatical errors.
We act because we believe in this quote: ” You can fool some people some time, but you cannot fool all people all time”

Mohamed S. Kamel
internationalnews-owner@yahoogroups.com
www.apm-ram.com


Disclaimer
We are committed to free knowledge, unless otherwise indicated, the opinions, personal articles or news analysis expressed on this e-mails are not necessarily those of the sender. This e-mail has been compiled in good faith. It is our condition that, in exchange for this free information, you the receiver accept that we will not be liable for any action you, the user take based on the information in this e-mail. It is essential that you, the user verify any and/or all information contained herein before making your final decision. This e-mail does not necessarily endorse the ideas or presentation of ideas of the sites it links to and with. We make no representations about any linked web site's accuracy, completeness, and authenticity. We firmly believe in the Freedom of Speech. We believe in civilized exchange of ideas and thoughts. We will hold any one trying to damage our image legally responsible before the courts and will keep ourselves the right to pursue the perpetrators to the maximum law limit. If you do not agree with this disclaimer or would like to stop receiving our e-mails, please unsubscribe, if you find that this e-mail is a good source of knowledge and would like to invite any others, please feel free.




Monday, June 2, 2003

اليوم عادل شرقاوي وغدا من ؟ لذا يجب أن نشارك تغطيه وتعليق: محمد شريف كامل


اليوم عادل شرقاوي وغدا من ؟
لذا يجب أن نشارك


تغطيه وتعليق: محمد شريف كامل
2 يونيو 2003



هل تعرف أنه بموجب قانون الشهادة الأمنية (Security Certificate) أنه الأدلة غير المعلنة قد تستخدم ضدك يوما ما ولا يسمح لك ولا لمحاميك بالإطلاع عليها، وقد تدان بموجبها وليس لك حق الطعن.

إن المخابرات الكندية (CSIS) تعتقد أن كل مسلم هو خلية نائمة تنتظر من يطلقها وينقلبوا جميعا إلى إرهابيين وهو نفس المفهوم المغلوط الذى دأبت الحركة الصهيونية على ترويجه و هى ذات المهمة التى دأب (Danial Pipe) وأمثاله وهو من النشطين الرئيسيين فى إدارة الرئيس بوش وهو الأب الروحى لكثير من السياسيين اليمينيين فى كندا.

لقد أدرك ذلك البعض من التجربة القاسية لعادل شرقاوى وأسرته،  ولذلك فقد شكلوا تحالفا للدفاع عن حقه فى العدالة.  وكما طالعتنا جريدة لا برس الناطقة بالفرنسية فى مونتريال حيث قالت " تحت لافتة مكتوب عليها العدالة لعادل شرقاوى إجتمع العديد لسماع قصة الشاب المغربى ذو الثلاثون عاما و الذى هاجر إلى كندا هو وعائلته عام 1995 حالمين بالحياة السعيدة فى بلد جميل يحكمه العدل والقانون."

فعادل شرقاوى هو شاب متزوج و له طفلة تبلغ من العمر 18 شهرا وزوجته حامل فى الشهر السادس، ولقد تعلم فى العديد من  المعاهد العلمية ومنها مدارس يهودية، وحاصل على شهادته بتدريس اللغة الفرنسية ويقوم بعمل دراسات عليا فى جامعة مونتريال، لقد ألقى القبض عليه فى 21 مايو 2003  بواسطة البوليس الفيدرالى  بلا جريمة إرتكبها سوى شهادة أمنية وقعها (icitor  GeneraThe Sol)
 ووزير الهجرة بناء على توصيه من المخابرات الكندية (CSIS) بإعتباره خطرا على الأمن العام. ويصبح  الأمر غايه في الخطوره أذا أخذنا فى الإعتبار أن تلك المخابرات هى ذاتها التى تحوم حولها الشبهات أخيرا فى قيامها بطمس الحقيقة وإخفاء الملفات فى حادث الطائرة الهندية المنكوبة منذ 10 سنوات.

ولقد نظم الإجتماع بمعرفة التحالف لتحقيق العدالة لعادل شرقاوى، وهو تحالف من العديد من المؤسسات والأفراد وعلى رأسهم مجلس مسلمى مونتريال (MCM) و صوت الضمير (Voice of Conscience) ومنازل لا قنابل (Home not Bomb) من تورونتو وقد حضر اللقاء العديد من المهتمين بقضية عادل الشرقاوى فى 31 مايو، حيث تم التذكير بأسماء المحتجزين على ذمة الشهادة الأمنية وهم محمد محجوب المحتجز منذ عام 2000، ومحمد حركات منذ ديسمبر 2002، ومحمد جاب الله منذ 1999، والأن عادل الشرقاوى ... وهذا ليس التهديد الوحيد للعرب والمسلمين، إلا إن ذلك كان إضافة للتمييز العنصرى اليومى وحملات التشويه الإعلامى وترحيل اللاجئين السياسيين من فلسطينيين وجزائريين.

وفي كلمه للسيد عبد السلام المنياوى رئيس (MCM) "إنه كيف لنا أن نثق فى المخابرات الكندية بينما أحد رجالهم والمسمى ( دافيد) لا يستطيع أن يحدد عدد سكان مصر ولا يعرف دول شمال أفريقيا ويعتقد أن أيران دولة عربية وهو من المفترض أنه متخصص فى قضايا الشرق الأوسط "
وأضاف السيد المنياوى"أن هذا القانون هو التهديد الحقيقى للأمن القومى الكندى لأنه مع شعور الناس بالا عدل سوف يحجمون عن إبلاغ الأمن"  ولقد ناشد الإعلام بمعاملة الأمر بأمانه شديدة وعدم التعرض لعائلة شرقاوى والإضرار بهم و نشر صورهم وعناوينهم وما إلى ذلك وعليهم بالتوقف عن الإشارة لحتمية إنتمائه للقاعدة لكونه مسلم زار باكستان ويدرب الكاراتيه.

وقد تحدث السيد إمانويل عن حركة لا أحد غير قانوني حيث قال"نحن نتضامن مع كل كندى يعانى من إضطهاد، ونحن ندين كل إحتجاز ومحاكمةغير عادلة، وأشارإلى كيفية أن الولايات المتحدة وكندا تعامل المقاومة الفلسطينية على أنها إرهاب رغم كونها مقاومة للإحتلال وأرهاب الدولة، إن هذا الموقف هوموقف غير أخلاقى، وكذلك الإضطهاد والتفرقة ضد العرب والمسلمين هو محاولة لتحويلهم إلى كبش فداء لخلق مناخ عام من الخوف ولتزيد الجهات الأمنية من ميزانيتها"

وعن الجزائريين المعرضيين للترحيل تحدث محمد شلبى عن كيفية أن كندا لم تعد تحترم حقوق الإنسان ولكنها فقط  تنشدالعمل وحركة رأس المال.

وعن كيفية تعامل المخابرات الكندية مع الأمور الأمنية، يقول رياض سالوجي المدير التنفيذى لهيئة العلاقات الأمريكية الإسلامية (CAN-CAIR) فى مقاله المنشور بجريده الجلوب أند ميل تحت عنوان -المخابرات الكندية وأمر قبض ينافى قواعد القانون- " سوف يكون من المستحيل أن نعرف إن كان عادل شرقاوى المتهم بإنتمائه لتنظيم القاعدة مذنب أم برئ" .." إن جميع الكنديين يجب أن يساورهم القلق من الإرهاب ولكن فى ذات الوقت هناك سبب أخر للقلق من قضية شرقاوى وكثير من الحالات المشابهة له أمام المحاكم الا وهو سيادة القانون، إن إصدار الشهادات الأمنية هوأمر بلا شك غير واضح ولاتحكمة الشفافية، إن تلك الشهادات تصدر عن إجراءات إدارية بلا مراقبة برلمانية،  وبناءا عليه يتم إصباغ أفراد بأنهم إرهابيين من خلال إدلة قد تكون ملفقة، مصدرها نظم غير ديمقراطية، وعلى أحسن الأوجه تلك الأدلة هى أدلة إحتماليه. إن الطابع السياسى لتلك الشهادات مقر به من أحد العاملين السابقين بالمخابرات الكندية (Michel Juneau Katsuya) والذى أشار لإعتقال شرقاوى على أنه قد يكون هجوم وقائى لإعطاب شبكة، أو تم تحت ضغط أولإرضاء الولايات المتحدة، وإذا سلمنا بأنه هناك بعض الأدلةإلا أن شرقاوى سوف يبقى يدافع عن نفسه وهو أعمى لأنه هو ومحاميه لن يسمح لهما بالإطلاع على لب الإدعاء و جوهره، ولأن أغلب الأدله لن تعلن فإن شرقاوى سوف يصارع معركته فى الظلام.

وإسترسل السيد رياض سالوجي" وقد قال شرقاوى أنهم قد إعتقلوه لأنه رفض التعاون معهم والتجسس على الجالية الإسلامية وهذه ليست الحالة الوحيدة التى يحتج فيهاعلى المخابرات الكندية  ومنهم ما تم الإشارة إليه فى الإعلام، مثل طلبهم إعتقال إمام مصرى فى رحلة عادية لكندا، ومحاولتهم المستمرة للتجنيد داخل الجالية الجزائرية، ومشاركتهم فى ترحيل ماهر عرار الكندى السورى، ولقد علق المحامى (Clayton Ruby) من تورونتوبمقاله "إن ممارسات المخابرات الكندية فى العمل السرى مسجلة من خلال كتاب (Covert Entry) للمحقق (Andrew Mitrovica) وذلك الكتاب يمثل نظرة متفحصة لما يجري من تلاعب بالضرائب وتزوير وتدمير ملفات وأدلة"

وتحت عنوان ( عندما تسقط الحرية بأسم الأمن) وحول الممارسات المضادة للإرهاب كان المقال بجريدة جلوب أند ميل "... قليلا من ذلك يطمئن الحريصين على الحريات العامة، فبينما نفترض حسن النية فى السلطات فإنهم ليسوا فوق الشبهات فيمايخص على أقل تقدير سوء التوجيه، فالقليل من الحالات التى عرضت جنائيا على العامة والقضاء توضح الدليل على ذلك ولنأخذ على سبيل المثال طارق عدلى خفاجى  وهو من أصل مصرى و قد عمل بلأفران فى مونتريال حيث ألقى القبض عليه عام 2000 بواسطة عميل (RCMP) بناء على معلومة أدت إلى إتهامه بترتيب لتفجير القنصليةالإسرائيلية، وبعد أن قضى السيد خفاجى خمسة أشهر فى الحبس ظهرت الحقيقة الفاضحة، وهى أن  ذلك العميل مدين له بمبلغ 6000 دولار وتصورأنه بإتهامه إياه سوف يعفى من دفع الدين.  وفيما يخص السيد جاب الله فلقد علق القاضى ماكاى تكمار عن سوء إستغلال الإجراءات لإن إدارة الهجرة  لم تستجيب بدقة لطلبه الحماية من إحتمال التعذيب أوالقتل إذا ما تم ترحيله إلى مصر. إن فقدان الحماية عندما تسمح الإدلة السرية كافيا أن يجعل القاضى جيمى هجسن يعبرعن قلقه هو وإخرين من القضاء قائلا " نحن نكرها، نحن لا نحب تلك الإجراءات التى تجعلنا نجلس منفردين لنسمع طرفا واحدا "...

وفي مقال(المخابرات الكندية تقول أن المهاجر هو عميلا للقاعدة) ل "تو ثانهها" فى جريدة جلوب أند ميل  " ...نحن لدينا معلومات أن الشرقاوى يصلح تماما لتوصيف العميل النائم الذى من الممكن أن ينشط فى أى لحظة.  فإن المعلومات المقدمة من المخابرات تقول أن أحد عملاءها أخذ فى مراقبة الشرقاوى لفترة و لكنه قبض عليه الأن لأنه فى خلال حرب العراق طالب وزير الإعلام العراقى المسلمين فى العالم إعلان الحرب المقدسة ضد التحالف الأمريكى الأنجليزى... إن المعلومات التى نشرت بالأمس القريب لم تنفى كل المعلومات الأساسية، تعطى الإحساس أن السيد شرقاوى كان يدرب كاراتيه  وأنه يعرف مسلمون أخرون يعتبرون مصدر خطر.

هذا وقد أصدر العديد من المنظمات والهيئات العامه والجمعيات الأهليه بيانات  وتصريحات صحفيه تدين ذلك العدوان على الحريات التي يمارس في كندا بأسم حمايه الأمن، حتى أوشكنا أن نلحق بدول العالم الثالث.

ففى بيانه الصحفى قال الإتحاد الكندى العربى "إن الشهادة الأمنيه هى إهانة لكل كندى وأنه من الواجب إعادة النظر فى كل الممارسات التى تسمح بالإحتجاز والإبعاد لأفراد بناء على الشهادات الوزارية التى تصدر بموجب قوانين الهجرة واللجوء.  وقد أضاف الإتحاد الكندى العربى أن إستخدام تلك الشهادات الأمنية فى مونتريال فى الأسبوع الماضى ضد عادل الشرقاوى لإشتباه فى إرتباطه بالإرهاب وكذلك مع محمود جاد الله فى تورونتو والذى دام إحتجازه عامان لإشتباه مماثل، هذه ممارسات غير كندية أن يحتجزإى شخص دون إتهام أو إثبات إدانة، إن ذلك هو ضد أقل القواعد القانونية. وقد طالب الإتحاد الكندى العربى  بتغيير تلك الممارسات للسماح بمراجعة الأدلة والتحقق منها بدون إثارة الرعب من الخطورة على الأمن العام. "... إن القاضى يجب أن يستمع لطرفى القصة ومراجعة الإدعاء والتحقق منها وهذا هو السبيل الوحيد لإقامة العدل فى مجتمع متحضر.

أما المنتدى الإسلامى الكندى  فقد أشار فى بيانه إلى أن المعاملة غير العادلة التي يعامل بهاالسيد شرقاوى هى إهانة لكل القيم الكندية وإن الإحتجاز وفق الشهادة الأمنية هو جزء من المعاداة للعرب والمسلمين، ولذا فإن المنتدى الإسلامى الكندى يطالب بالتطبيق الفورى للآئحة الحقوق والحريات وبموجبها يطبق حق المدعى عليه فى معاملة عادلة. إن الأمن الكندى دائما محفوظ بالقانون العام الكندى ولذا فإن جميع الكنديين وبغض النظر  عن أصولهم العرقية أو دينهم فهم جميعا محميين بالقانون.  إن لائحة الحقوق والحريات هى الضمان الأساسى للحقوق المدنية لكل المواطنيين الكنديين وفقا للقانون الوضعى، ولذا يجب حماية الجميع ضد الإدانة المسبقة بواقع الأدلة السرية والتصنيف العرقى واللجوء إلى الإجراءات العادلة.  إن إسلوب معالجة قضية عادل شرقاوى بواسطة بعض الأجهزة الإعلامية يمثل عنصريه لربطه بأصله العربى وربطه بالقاعدة وملاحقته بالشهادة الأمنية بإسلوب غير عادل.

وفى بيان مشترك صادر عن كل من إتحاد الحقوق والحريات  وهيئة حقوق الإنسان بكندا والمؤسسة الأمريكية للعدل وتحالف المراقبة الدولية للحريات المدنية، أدان الموقعيين عليه الحكومة الكندية لإستخدامها " الشهادة الأمنية " فى إعتقال عادل شرقاوى، وقال البيان إن هذه الشهادة المصممه لحماية الأمن العام أصبحت هى ذاتها تهديدا للأمن العام.  إن الإجراءات بموجب تلك الشهادة هى منافية تماما للقواعد الأساسية للعدالة و تطبيقها قد يؤدى إلى ترحيل اللاجئ أوالمهاجر لموطنه الأصلى حيث قد يعذب أو يقتل.

وقد تحدث روكو جالاتى محامى عادل شرقاوى والمدافع عن الحقوق المدنيه حيث قال: أنه أمر غير مقبول أن يسجن مواطن بدون أن يعرف أى دليل للتهمة الموجهة إليه ولوأن لديهم إية إدلة لما لا يقاضى بموجب القانون الجنائى، إن ما يحدث هنا بموجب تلك القوانين هو تماما ما حدث فى فرنسا قبل الثورة فيما سمى خطاب الإختفاء (Lettre de Cachet) وهى ذات الإجراءات التى إستخدمتها كندا فى الحرب العالمية الثانية ضد اليابانييون والإيطاليون الكنديين. هذا هو عنوان العصور الوسطى لقد عدنا لم قبل لائحة الحقوق الإنجليزية ولائحة الثورة الفرنسية، لقد عدنا إلى حيث لا حقوق دستورية وأصبحنا نستطيع أن نقرر ما نريد فى السر.

لقد أصبح الخوف جزء من حياة المسلم والمواطن الكندى من أصل عربى، والكنديين بشكل عام أصبحوا يشعرون أقل أمنا، وهذا ما أقره السيد يحي عبد الرحمن محرر أخبار مونتريال على الإنترنيت فى مقاله بعنوان "ككندى لقد جعلتنى المخابرات الكندية أقل أمنا وإستخدامها للشهادة الأمنية غير مقبول" حيث قال: لقد طلب منا أن نثق بهم لأنهم إذا أعلنوا أدلة الإتهام سوف يعرض الأمن الكندى للخطر ... والمشكلة أن هذا الأسلوب لا يسمح بالمحاسبة والعدل كما هو معروف بالنظام الجنائى فى كندا، وكيف لنا أن نتأكد من أن السلطات لا تعمل بموجب الأحكام المسبقة ولا ترتكب أخطاء... إن لائحة الحريات الكندية قد أكدت علىأن كل شخص يلقى القبض عليه له الحق فى أن يخبر بكل دقه عن سبب ذلك الإحتجاز، والبند 11 يقرأن كل شخص يعتبر برئ حتى تثبت إدانته وفقا للقانون فى محكمة علنية عادلة خلال محكمة مستقلة ...إن تلك المبادئ لم تحترم مع عادل شرقاوى وأمثاله الذين وجدواأنفسهم فى ذات الظروف  فيما يسمى بالأدلة السرية ... ولوأن المخابرات الكندية طرقت باب منزلى فى منتصف الليل وإحتجزونى بموجب الأدلة السرية، لا يحق لى ولا لمحامى أن نتطلع على تلك الأدلة. إن السماح بحدوث ذلك  فى كندا هو التهديد الحقيقي لأمنها، حيث لن يبقى شخص أمن فى وطنه، وسيستدرجنا ذلك رويدا رويدا للعصورالبربرية ... لقد أصبح كل من هو مقيم فى كندا معرضا لذلك ويجب ان نقلق جميعا. إنه شرقاوى اليوم ولا أحد يعرف من غدا.

وفى مقال بالأمن يكبل الدفاع لجيكيسى منى بجريدة الجازيت الصادرة فى مونتريال" دخل عادل شرقاوى قاعة المحكمة مكبلا بالأغلال ولكنه بعد قليل ثبت أن المحكمة هى التى كبلت يديها... لقد قال القاضي سيمون نويل: إن المشرع أجبره على مراجعة حالة مثل حالة شرقاوى فى أقل من 48 ساعة من خطاب الإحتجاز ولديه سبعة أيام فقط لمراجعة المعلومات المقدمة له من الحكومة وفي ذات الوقت عليه التأكد من أن الإجراءات تتم بمراعاة القانون وأنه من الضرورى إطلاع المتهم  على التهمة الموجهة ضده، وتحدث القاضى عن علاقه محدوديه المعلومات التى سوف يطلع عليها المتهم وتعارضها مع الأمن العام الكندى والعدل المنشود فلم يستطع القاضى تحديد مدى تلك العلاقة. وأضاف الكاتب أنه فى الإجراءات القانونية الجنائيه الطبيعية يكون الإدعاء هو الملزم أمام القاضى والمحلفون بإثبات صحة الأدلة بما لا يدع مجالا للشك، والإدعاء يجب أن يبلغ كل الأدلة للدفاع،  وهذا هو الوضع الطبيعى العادى فى بلادنا هذه، ولكنه فى حالة شرقاوى  فالوضع مختلف حيث قد تم إستدعائه دون جريمة فى قضية قد يقدمها القاضى على النحو التالى  (إن الحكومة تقول إنك خطر على الأمن القومى وأنه يجب طردك من البلاد وهذا هوأغلب الأدلة ضدك ولا أستطيع إطلاعك على ما دون ذلك لخطورته على الأمن القومى والأن عليك أن تقنعني بأن هذا الكلام غير صحيح) ..."


إن التجمع لتحقيق العدالة لعادل شرقاوى هو تحالف لتحقيق العدل لكل كندا ولذا وجب العمل معه لإسقاط تلك القوانين الظالمة ولنكون جميعا سواء أمام القانون الوضعى الطبيعى وليس رهناء لمكتب المخابرات .   لقد دعا التحالف إلى تجمع يوم 2 يوليو أمام محكمة مونتريال الكائنه ب 80 ماكجيل
الساعة 9 صباحا حيث سوف ينظر فى قضية عادل شرقاوى ... وكل المعلومات عن التحالف متوفرة على
www.adilinfo.org على موقع إليكترونى 
justiceforadil@riseup.net وعلى بريد إليكترونى 
 Home not Bomb 416-651-5800 وعلى الهاتف تورونتو 

والأن وقد عرفنا جميعا أن تلك القوانين والشهادة الأمنية والأدلة السرية قد تستخدم  ضد أى منا وفى أى وقت حيث لا أنت ولا محاميك سوف يتطلع  على أى من الأدلة المحتملة ضدك ومن ثم يسهل جدا أن تثبت عليك التهمة وبلا حق فى الطعن أوالإستئناف، لقد إقتربنا من نظم العالم الثالث ، وأسفاه على كندا.

 ولذا فالوقت قد حان لمقاومة ذلك الظلم وإلغاء تلك القوانين، وهذا يحتاج للكثير من الجهد والمال ولذا وجب أن تفيق كل المؤسسات المدنية والإجتماعية  والدينية وأن تقرر جزء من ميزانيتها لمقاومة الفساد والدفاع عن المظلومين ومقاضاة الحكومة أمام المحكمة الدستورية لإسقاط تلك القوانيين الفاسدة.

اللهم بلغت ،اللهم فأشهد.