Reading in the Canadian Federal Election
(Before the election)
Mohamed S. Kamel*;
Jun 15, 2004
While
the federal election is looming in the very near future, it is important to try
to evaluate the system and the parties before they start bombarding us with
there artificial election propaganda.
We
have a democratic system that have some advantage and some disadvantage as all
human been products, we have a system that gives us, the voters, the write to
choose without any direct pressure but in the other hand the pressure is coming
form the election propaganda and the media interference, the greatest power in
our century, special with the concentration of the media in the hand of few
interest groups.
We
have a system that, to a limit, control the expenditure of the candidates and
the parties and make them accountable to all expenditure, a system that just been
modified two years ago to use the tax payers money to finance the parties as
per the vote they gain, a system that pay to the parties $1.36/ voter/ year. This
system is still missing a very important future, still missing the proportional
representation which distributes the seats in the parlement as per the
percentage of the votes for each party But above all this system did not know
the election fraud yet.
Before
they start bombarding us with there artificial election propaganda, we should
take a deep look at the different parties positions and actions not platforms,
because platforms do not represent anything but empty promises.
We
had two parties alternating governing Canada, The Liberal and the
Conservative; they alternated the government as long as there are no other
parties able to influence the outcome of the long debates in the parlement.
This
concept have been changed in the last year and half since June 2004 when the
Liberal party was not able to achieve the absolute majority, where the power
came back to the people, where every party and member of the parlement started
to count the days looking for the very close election were people dose not
forget yet.
So
we gain some basic wrights, we gain the Gommory inquiry, not real full
investigation, but still an investigation of a party in power. With a pressure
and political manoeuvre from the NDP assisted by the Bloc Quebecois, we get the
some financial pay back to the municipalities, some commitment to the health
care, limiting the control of the big corporations over the government and we
get limitation to the USA
controlling of our regulations and foreign relations.
Let
us summaries the evaluation of the main federal parties through out the last
few years;
Category
|
Bloc Québécois
|
Conservatives
|
Liberals
|
New Democratic Party
(NDP)
|
·
Undemocratic Laws
(Security Certificate, Bill C-36, proposed Bill C-18),
|
· Opposed
undemocratic laws and Pushed for sunset clause for Bill C-36
|
· Supported
Security Certificate, Bill C-36, proposed Bill C-18.
|
· Issued
the so-called anti-terrorist laws which legalize the use of secret evidence
and proposed a law that could strip Canadian citizenship under the secret
evidence act.
|
· Opposed
undemocratic laws and Pushed for sunset clause for Bill C-36
|
·
Media concentration and
free speech
|
· Limit
ownership in media corporations
|
· Generally
supportive of large corporations
|
· Does
not see a problem with media concentration
|
· Calls
for limiting the ownership in media corporations
|
·
Health Care:
|
· Federal
government should give up the idea of a Canada wide Healthcare standard
and live it up to the provinces
|
· Doesn’t
object to the idea of a two-tier healthcare system
|
· No
mechanism to protect the public system and refuse to fight private health
care!
|
· Believes
in the importance of a Canada
wide standard and one tier public healthcare system.
|
·
Education
|
· Quebec should decide on its
own education system.
|
· Not
ready to increase spending on education.
|
· Little
energy directed towards the issue of education and there were no increase in
education funding.
|
· Increase
educational budget and help repay student loans.
|
·
War on Iraq
and the United Nations
|
· Did
not support intervention in Iraq without UN
approval.
|
· Supported
the war on Iraq
and called for participation with the USA with or without UN approval.
|
· Refused
to participate in the USA’s
war on Iraq,
but allowed individuals to participate, Canadian army is participating in the
occupation of Afghanistan.
|
· Opposed
the war on Iraq with or
without UN approval and the invasion of any country.
|
·
Space militarization
program “Star Wars”
|
· Against
participation in the space militarization program “Star
Wars”.
|
· Supports participation in the USA space militarization program
“Star Wars”.
|
· Plans
to participate in the USA
space militarization program “Star
Wars”, started a partial participation.
|
· Against
participation in the space militarization program “Star
Wars”.
|
·
Palestine
|
· Called
for Canada to act in
conformity with its own politics of refusing to recognize Israeli control
over occupied lands and concerned about the USA denying the Palestinians the
right of return.
|
· The
most pro-Israel (Pro-Zionist) federal party in Canada
|
· Recognizes
the right of the Palestinians to a state but without pressuring the occupier
(Israel) and refuses to
refer the apartheid wall issue to the international court and oppose any UN
resolution against Israel.
|
· Supports
the Palestinians’ right for self-determination and their right of return and
opposes Israeli practices as well as the wall
|
We
have to insist in participating and not be afraid of any minority government;
we have to recognize that the parties in opposition have strong power as long
as we don not have dictatorship of a party with vast majority.
We
have to recognize that our vote is valuable and our future is in our hand not
in any single politician hand.
* Mohamed S. Kamel, is a Freelanc
ewriter, editor of the International News
and President of Alternative
Perspective Media (APM-RAM), could be reached at info@apm-ram.org
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home