Nakbah, 60 years or long before?
A reading in the history could be useful for the
future;
By: Mohamed S. Kamel*
Montreal May 14th, 2008
Most of us
remember 1948’s catastrophe, The Nakbah; the days when almost 900,000 Palestinians
were forced to flee their homes and become refugees, the worst refugee crisis
in history. Citizens, that should have been refugees for a few days ended up
being so for 60 years and amount to more than 4 millions.
But this Nakbah
did not start in 1948 it started long before; and it is well known to many of
us but not to all.
The Nakbah
really started in 1825, in Arrarat, when Mordechai Emanuel Noah[i]
purchased the Grand Island, near Buffalo New York, as a homeland for
demoralized Jews.
The Nakbah was
renewed in 1890, with the scandal known as “The Dreyfus Affair” [ii].
That political scandal, with anti-Semitic overtones, is what divided France
from the 1890s to the early 1900s. It involved the wrongful conviction for
treason, in 1894, and the degradation and imprisonment on Devil's Island, of
Captain Alfred Dreyfus, a young and promising French artillery officer who was
in advanced training with the Army's General Staff.
The anti-Jewish
sentiment that rocked the west from Europe to North America was the real reason
behind the Nakbah and the real start. But the Nakbah practically started in
1897, when Theodore Herzl[iii]
met with Mordechai Emanuel Noah and both converted the people’s yells in
Dreyfus' convection "Death to the traitor, death to the Jews" into a
project of a Jewish state.
Herzl wrote:
"A Jewish state" - this is the only solution to anti-Semitism. Herzl
decided to work hard so that the Jews could have a state of their own. He
hardly saw or spent any time with his family. His friends thought he was crazy.
They did not believe it was possible to establish a state for the Jewish
people. Orthodox Jews argued that it is forbidden to establish a Jewish state,
because only Hashem will return the Jews to the land of Israel. The Jews were
scared that if they began to desire their own state - this would lead to even
more hatred. But Herzl did not give up.
They did not
get the help they were looking for in the beginning. When Herzl met with important people, leaders
and ministers of influential European countries (Germany, England, Turkey and
Russia), he wanted them to help the Jews get a legal right (charter) to
establish a state of their own.
Herzl invited
representatives of the Jewish communities from all over the world to the first
Zionist congress in 1897 in Basel (Bazel), Switzerland. The representatives at
the congress decided that they wanted to establish a home land (state) for the
Jewish people.
The British
offered them what was commonly known as the "Uganda Project[iv]" before the Sixth Zionist Congress (Basel,
August 1903), carrying the majority (295:178, 98 abstentions), then Argentina
in 1904’s declaration, but both failed to be sold to the Jewish people.
While Herzl did
not live to see the rejection of the Uganda plan or even the Argentina plan,
his successor chose Palestine, where they can convince Jews to immigrate to the
Promised Land.
In 1906, the
Zionist congress decided that the Jewish homeland should be Palestine.
So Palestine
was not the goal because of religious reasons but rather became the reason to
reach a state.
They tried with
the Sultan of Turkey, but the Sultan refused to cede Palestine to
Zionists. They tried with Egypt to get
Al 'Arish, in the Sinai Peninsula, adjoining southern Palestine, but failed yet
again.
The Zionist
movement started out secular then turned into a coalition between Jewish
religious and seculars where the religious side attracts the Christian Zionist.
The opposition
to Zionism from Torah leaders was initially almost universal. These authorities
rejected Zionism as a heresy without genuine basis within Judaism, and in
conflict with the teachings of the Torah. In 1892, Rabbi Isaac Meyer Wise, at
that time the most representative Jewish personality in America, denounced, in
a Montreal conference, the Zionist project as entirely antithetical to the
spirit and letter of Judaic teachings:
“We totally disapprove of the initiative
aiming at the creation of a Jewish State. Attempts of this type highlight an
erroneous conception of the mission of Israel ... that the Jewish Prophets were
the first to proclaim ... It aims at a Messianic time when men recognize
belonging to one great community for the establishment of the Kingdom of God on
earth.”[v].
This movement
is still alive and has it is own supporters[vi]
even within the state itself[vii].
Because the
establishment of the Jewish state would need the approval or the collapse of
Ottoman Empire, European Jewish offered Europe their support in the WWI in
return of their right in Palestine. So the result was the Balfour Declaration
in 1917[viii]. That declaration was made in a letter from
Arthur James Balfour, the British Foreign Secretary, to Lord Rothschild, a
leader of the British Jewish community, for transmission to the Zionist
Federation. The "Balfour Declaration" was later incorporated into the
“Sèvres Peace Treaty[ix]” with Turkey and the Mandate for Palestine.
[Foreign Office,
November 2nd, 1917.
Dear Lord Rothschild,
I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's
Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist
aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet:
"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine
of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to
facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that
nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of
existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political
status enjoyed by Jews in any other country".
I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of
the Zionist Federation.
Yours sincerely
Arthur James Balfour]
In spite of all
this, the immigration rate to Palestine was very low and they did not meet their
real goal for the establishment of the state until the early thirties.
This era was
marked by the raise of the Nazism movement and the threat from Germany’s new
plan for an obligatory displacement of Jewish from Europe to Madagascar, where
they can establish a Jewish homeland, in what is known as “Madagascar Plan[x]”.
Such plan and all the discrimination against Jews in Europe was the success
start of the mass immigration to Palestine.
The other
problem faced by the Zionist’s plan was the Arab Jews, who were living a
reasonable wealthy life in their countries[xi].
The Zionist movement is in real need for them for two reasons. First, the
political argument for Jewish state will not be acceptable as long as there are
Jews living a peaceful life in Arab countries. Second, the project needs finance
and by them living in their native lands, the Arab countries, no finance would
be wired to the new born state.
The huge
example about this issue was the “Lavon Affair”, where a failed Israeli covert
operation in Egypt known as Operation Susannah occurred, in which Egyptian,
American, British and manly Jewish owned targets in Egypt were bombed in the
summer of 1954[xii].
Some people
might consider it a pro-Palestinian propaganda but it is the history and the
reality. Even Zionists cannot deny it.
To recover from
this Nakbah, we have to recognize the cause and work for justice. We have to remember that it is the
Palestinian’s land. Still, at the same
time, we have to recognize the reality.
Recognizing the
reality does not mean giving up the land and the rights but struggling to
achieve a real justice and long stand solution to the problem.
There is a big
different between wishing and what could be done. In real life, there is no “Undo” but there is;
let us do it.
Many of today’s
Jewish recognize the grave mistake done on behalf of their name and we have to
work with them hand in hand to return the golden era when Jews and other Arabs were
living side by side in harmony in peace and full citizenship. Let us promote the one
state solution, the only solution by applying the South Africa model and live
two people in one state[xiii].
So it is not 60
years it is long before, but is it going to stop here?
* Mohamed S. Kamel: is a Freelance
writer, the editor of I.N. Daily http://indaily.net/,
co-founder of the Canadian Egyptian for Democracy (CEFD), Alternative
Perspective Media (APM-RAM) and the Canadian Muslim Forum (FMC-CMF), could be
reached at mskamel@fmc-cmf.com
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home